On Sat, 2015-01-31 at 15:42 +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
> I agree with you that they are two distinct problems, with perhaps a
> 3rd problem of how to generalize this to other devices than PCI devices?
>
> Right now the
> handling of requester IDs across bridges seems very rudimentary in the
> QEM
On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 08:40 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Adding Knut to CC as he particularly looked into and fixed the bridging
> issues or the vtd emulation. I will have to refresh my memories first.
Thanks for cc'ing me, Jan -
Yes I did some work specifically to serve my need of being able to use
Adding Knut to CC as he particularly looked into and fixed the bridging
issues or the vtd emulation. I will have to refresh my memories first.
Jan
On 2015-01-30 06:45, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi folks !
>
>
> I've looked at the intel iommu code to try to figure out how to properly
> imp
Hi folks !
I've looked at the intel iommu code to try to figure out how to properly
implement a Power8 "native" iommu model and encountered some issues.
Today "pseries" ppc machine is paravirtualized and so uses a pretty
simplistic iommu model that essentially has one address space per host
brid
