Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches merged

2014-09-12 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:14:01AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 12.09.2014 um 09:02 hat Gonglei (Arei) geschrieben: > > > > Now we need a wiki entry describing the process. > > > > Also we need something reminding who is the maintainer of the current > > > week. > > > > > > Usually obvious from t

Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches merged

2014-09-12 Thread Gonglei (Arei)
> From: Markus Armbruster [mailto:arm...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 5:02 PM > To: Gonglei (Arei) > Cc: Kevin Wolf; Benoît Canet; Stefan Hajnoczi; qemu-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches > merged &

Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches merged

2014-09-12 Thread Markus Armbruster
"Gonglei (Arei)" writes: >> From: Kevin Wolf [mailto:kw...@redhat.com] [...] >> I'll probably keep reviewing paches without an R-b when they are simple >> or in my area of expertise (like qcow2), like any other reviewer should. >> The point is just that when I don't, before you ping us maintainer

Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches merged

2014-09-12 Thread Gonglei (Arei)
> From: Kevin Wolf [mailto:kw...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 4:46 PM > To: Gonglei (Arei) > Cc: Markus Armbruster; Benoît Canet; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Stefan > Hajnoczi > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches > merged >

Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches merged

2014-09-12 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 12.09.2014 um 10:32 hat Gonglei (Arei) geschrieben: > > From: Kevin Wolf [mailto:kw...@redhat.com] > > Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 4:14 PM > > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches > > merged > > > > Am 12.09.2014 um

Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches merged

2014-09-12 Thread Gonglei (Arei)
> From: Kevin Wolf [mailto:kw...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 4:14 PM > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches > merged > > Am 12.09.2014 um 09:02 hat Gonglei (Arei) geschrieben: > > Hi, > > > > > Subjec

Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches merged

2014-09-12 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 12.09.2014 um 09:02 hat Gonglei (Arei) geschrieben: > Hi, > > > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches > > merged > > > > Benoît Canet writes: > > > > >> EOF > > >> --- > > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches merged

2014-09-12 Thread Gonglei (Arei)
Hi, > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches > merged > > Benoît Canet writes: > > >> EOF > >> --- > >> If you have feedback or questions, let us know. The process can be > >> tweaked as time goes o

Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches merged

2014-09-11 Thread Markus Armbruster
Benoît Canet writes: >> EOF >> --- >> If you have feedback or questions, let us know. The process can be >> tweaked as time goes on so we can continue to improve. > > Great mail. Yup. Let's see how it works out. > Now we need a wiki entry describing the process. > Also we need something remin

Re: [Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches merged

2014-09-11 Thread Benoît Canet
> EOF > --- > If you have feedback or questions, let us know. The process can be > tweaked as time goes on so we can continue to improve. Great mail. Now we need a wiki entry describing the process. Also we need something reminding who is the maintainer of the current week. Best regards Benoît

[Qemu-devel] New requirement for getting block layer patches merged

2014-09-11 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
The time it takes for block layer patches to be reviewed and merged is a concern. Kevin and I want to discuss this issue, which was raised by Benoit, on the mailing list. The volume of patches is so high that Kevin and I cannot review them all in a timely manner. We are adjusting the process as