On 07/31/2013 12:19:03 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 31.07.2013 03:50, schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a patch I would like to submit and I am currently running it
past
> my employer's legal department. The legal department has identified
10
> different licenses in the Qemu code
Il 31/07/2013 07:45, Erik de Castro Lopo ha scritto:
> Stefan Weil wrote:
>
>> No, there is no such statement.
>>
>> There is an agreement that files with GPL should be GPLv2+
>> (not only GPLv2), but files may also use other free licenses.
>>
>> In file LICENSE, it is said that QEMU as a whole is
Stefan Weil wrote:
> No, there is no such statement.
>
> There is an agreement that files with GPL should be GPLv2+
> (not only GPLv2), but files may also use other free licenses.
>
> In file LICENSE, it is said that QEMU as a whole is released
> under the GNU General Public License.
>
> Some f
Am 31.07.2013 03:50, schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a patch I would like to submit and I am currently running it past
> my employer's legal department. The legal department has identified 10
> different licenses in the Qemu codebase and has asked about the two files
> I am modify
Hi all,
I have a patch I would like to submit and I am currently running it past
my employer's legal department. The legal department has identified 10
different licenses in the Qemu codebase and has asked about the two files
I am modifying:
linux-user/syscall.c
linux-user/syscall_defs.h
