On 8 April 2015 at 16:20, Peter Maydell wrote:
> It looks like we have perhaps only a few more issues which need fixes
> to go into 2.3, so what I'd like to do is hold rc3 until we have them
> all fixed and then roll an rc3 which will with luck be our final
> release (bar the version number).
>
>
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 01:48:25PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 04/08/2015 11:20 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >It looks like we have perhaps only a few more issues which need fixes
> >to go into 2.3, so what I'd like to do is hold rc3 until we have them
> >all fixed and then roll an rc3 which w
Am 08.04.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Peter Maydell:
> It looks like we have perhaps only a few more issues which need fixes
> to go into 2.3, so what I'd like to do is hold rc3 until we have them
> all fixed and then roll an rc3 which will with luck be our final
> release (bar the version number).
>
> C
On 04/08/2015 11:20 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
It looks like we have perhaps only a few more issues which need fixes
to go into 2.3, so what I'd like to do is hold rc3 until we have them
all fixed and then roll an rc3 which will with luck be our final
release (bar the version number).
Can people
It looks like we have perhaps only a few more issues which need fixes
to go into 2.3, so what I'd like to do is hold rc3 until we have them
all fixed and then roll an rc3 which will with luck be our final
release (bar the version number).
Can people reply to this mail if they have things that need
