On 06/13/2012 10:12 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>
>> I tried that and didn't make any difference...i.e. the RHEL6.3 RC1
>> guest booted in about ~1 min.
>>
> Thank you. So this means that ticket spinlock is not to blame for the
> slow down compared ti RHEL kernel.
>
> Where 3.4.1 spends most of the
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:44:07AM -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote:
> On 6/12/2012 8:39 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote:
> >>I rebuilt the 3.4.1 kernel in the guest from scratch and retried my
> >>experiments and measured
> >>the boot times...
> >>
>
On 6/12/2012 8:39 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote:
I rebuilt the 3.4.1 kernel in the guest from scratch and retried my
experiments and measured
the boot times...
a) Host : RHEL6.3 RC1 + qemu-kvm (that came with it)& Guest :
RHEL6.3 RC1: ~1
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 08:33:59AM -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote:
> I rebuilt the 3.4.1 kernel in the guest from scratch and retried my
> experiments and measured
> the boot times...
>
> a) Host : RHEL6.3 RC1 + qemu-kvm (that came with it) & Guest :
> RHEL6.3 RC1: ~1 min
>
> b) Host :3.4.1 + qemu-k
On 6/8/2012 11:37 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-06-08 20:20, Chegu Vinod wrote:
On 6/8/2012 11:08 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
[CC'ing qemu as this discusses its code base]
On 2012-06-08 19:57, Chegu Vinod wrote:
On 6/8/2012 10:42 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 10:10 -0700, Chegu
On 6/10/2012 2:30 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 11:20:53AM -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote:
On 6/8/2012 11:08 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
BTW, another data point ...if I try to boot a the RHEL6.3 kernel in
the guest (with the latest qemu.git and the 3.4.1 on the host) it
boots just fine...
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 11:20:53AM -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote:
> On 6/8/2012 11:08 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> BTW, another data point ...if I try to boot a the RHEL6.3 kernel in
> the guest (with the latest qemu.git and the 3.4.1 on the host) it
> boots just fine
>
> So something to do with the 3.
On 2012-06-08 20:20, Chegu Vinod wrote:
> On 6/8/2012 11:08 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> [CC'ing qemu as this discusses its code base]
>>
>> On 2012-06-08 19:57, Chegu Vinod wrote:
>>> On 6/8/2012 10:42 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 10:10 -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote:
> On 6/8/2
On 6/8/2012 11:08 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
[CC'ing qemu as this discusses its code base]
On 2012-06-08 19:57, Chegu Vinod wrote:
On 6/8/2012 10:42 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 10:10 -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote:
On 6/8/2012 9:46 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 1
[CC'ing qemu as this discusses its code base]
On 2012-06-08 19:57, Chegu Vinod wrote:
> On 6/8/2012 10:42 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 10:10 -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote:
>>> On 6/8/2012 9:46 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 16:29 +, Chegu Vinod wrote:
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
