Hello!
I just wanted to hear about the Large USB patch that was discussed quite
alot here a couple of months ago.
As I understood it the patch was put on hold until the 0.90 release, but
I've heard nothing more about it...
Is anybody (Tino, Lonnie?) working on getting the patch into CVS?
Would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With all due respect, Tino Seifert, I must comment on your USB patch. I do
not normally post to this list, but I follow it very closely as the project
is of great interest to me. I must admit that I have rarely even looked at
qemu code, and that I
Hello Lonnie.
Lonnie Mendez wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
>>
> Seeing as there is a release coming up this is most definitely not a
> good thing. Initial testing yielded lots of this.
> I'd like to see my all-in-one patch stripped out. Then simply
> modifying the linux redirector to
Hello Johannes,
I have to admit that your post did piss me off a little bit. But on the
other hand it would not help anybody, if I would shoot back, so I will
try to be as polite as possible.
My first note is on your first message, which I really have not
received. It is probably my fault, but I
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Also, you rename some things when it has no apparent use to rename them,
such as usb_device_add, or product_name.
Sorry but on that point you say things which are in no case provable by
any study.
Also kindly look into line 1417 and 1419 of your patch.
Hi,
nix.wie.weg wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > I am quite sure you put a lot of work into this patch, but you sure make
> > it hard to appreciate, too.
> >
> > First note that applying such a huge patch is bad. Let me help you (a
> > little more than last time)
> Sorry I dont know why,
Hi,
On 27/04/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Johannes,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > I am quite sure you put a lot of work into this patch, but you sure make it
> > hard to appreciate, too.
> >
> > First note that applying such a huge pat
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
I am quite sure you put a lot of work into this patch, but you sure make it
hard to appreciate, too.
First note that applying such a huge patch is bad. Let me help you (a little
more than last time) to understand that: You are almost guaranteed to
introduce bugs, and
Hello Johannes,
Thanks for your comments.
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> I am quite sure you put a lot of work into this patch, but you sure make it
> hard to appreciate, too.
>
> First note that applying such a huge patch is bad. Let me help you (a little
> more than last time)
Sorry I dont know
> As Fabrice pointed out to me yesterday, it takes time to understand the
> new usb api. To make this process easier I have assembled a small
> documentation.
> You will find it here:
> http://217.20.126.200/tino/usb_api.pdf
> http://217.20.126.200/tino/usb_api.odg
That is a nice description.
> t
Hello,
As Fabrice pointed out to me yesterday, it takes time to understand the
new usb api. To make this process easier I have assembled a small
documentation.
You will find it here:
http://217.20.126.200/tino/usb_api.pdf
http://217.20.126.200/tino/usb_api.odg
the patch which applies cleanly agai
11 matches
Mail list logo
