On 08.12.2017 00:56, Collin L. Walling wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to bring up a formal discussion regarding the utilization of
> reserved space
> in the IPL Parameter Blocks for s390x guests. Particularly the following:
>
> * How should we approach "claiming" bytes so that we do not obstruct
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 18:56:16 -0500
"Collin L. Walling" wrote:
> --- The Fields We Need To Store ---
>
> Currently, we're utilizing 3 bytes out of a 77 byte reserved field in
> the IPLB for
> CCW and SCSI. We do this because need a way to pass the Qemu command
> line opti
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 18:56:16 -0500
"Collin L. Walling" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to bring up a formal discussion regarding the utilization of
> reserved space
> in the IPL Parameter Blocks for s390x guests. Particularly the following:
>
> * How should we approach "claiming" bytes so that w
On 12/08/2017 12:56 AM, Collin L. Walling wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to bring up a formal discussion regarding the utilization of
> reserved space
> in the IPL Parameter Blocks for s390x guests. Particularly the following:
>
> * How should we approach "claiming" bytes so that we do not obst
Hello,
I'd like to bring up a formal discussion regarding the utilization of
reserved space
in the IPL Parameter Blocks for s390x guests. Particularly the following:
* How should we approach "claiming" bytes so that we do not obstruct
future development?
* What would be "the best" locatio
