On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:45:27PM -0400, Xingbo Wu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:32:12PM -0400, Xingbo Wu wrote:
> > > After running a 16-thread sync-random-write test against qcow2, It is
> > > observed that QCOW2 seems to be
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:32:12PM -0400, Xingbo Wu wrote:
> > After running a 16-thread sync-random-write test against qcow2, It is
> > observed that QCOW2 seems to be serializing all its metadata-related
> writes.
> > If qcow2 is desig
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:32:12PM -0400, Xingbo Wu wrote:
> After running a 16-thread sync-random-write test against qcow2, It is
> observed that QCOW2 seems to be serializing all its metadata-related writes.
> If qcow2 is designed to do this,* then what is the concern?* What would go
> wrong i
Hello guys,
After running a 16-thread sync-random-write test against qcow2, It is
observed that QCOW2 seems to be serializing all its metadata-related writes.
If qcow2 is designed to do this,* then what is the concern?* What would go
wrong if this ordering is relaxed?
By providing less features,
