On 2013-05-04 10:52, 李春奇 wrote:
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Please don't top-post.
>>
>> On 2013-05-04 10:45, 李春奇 wrote:
>>> But will the difference between the vendor ID and family number cause
>>> confusion to the OS in VM?
>>
>> The confusion is not yet clear to me.
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Please don't top-post.
>
> On 2013-05-04 10:45, 李春奇 wrote:
>> But will the difference between the vendor ID and family number cause
>> confusion to the OS in VM?
>
> The confusion is not yet clear to me. About which "-cpu ..." were you
> talking
Please don't top-post.
On 2013-05-04 10:45, 李春奇 wrote:
> But will the difference between the vendor ID and family number cause
> confusion to the OS in VM?
The confusion is not yet clear to me. About which "-cpu ..." were you
talking?
Jan
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
But will the difference between the vendor ID and family number cause
confusion to the OS in VM?
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-05-04 09:50, 李春奇 wrote:
>> Hi Jan and All,
>> I find that when enable KVM with qemu, vendor ID of simulated CPU will be
>> set the same as
On 2013-05-04 09:50, 李春奇 wrote:
> Hi Jan and All,
> I find that when enable KVM with qemu, vendor ID of simulated CPU will be
> set the same as host, but other features such as level, family, model,
> stepping are not changed. This may bring out a confusing result, the
> simulated CPU has a vendor
Hi Jan and All,
I find that when enable KVM with qemu, vendor ID of simulated CPU will be
set the same as host, but other features such as level, family, model,
stepping are not changed. This may bring out a confusing result, the
simulated CPU has a vendor name of "GenuineIntel" but with family num
