On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 03:52:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "John R. Hogerhuis"
>
> >
> > I can't say. But even if it were, I'd guess most here would rather work
> > under Unix-like OS.
>
> Undoubtably.
>
> The Linux builders outnumber the Win builders by probably 50 to one. If not
>
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 22:30 +0100, Tim Walker wrote:
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> I thought the Live CD was a bad idea until I realised it can still be
> booted under QEMU for non x86 users (Live CDs can be created for other
> platforms - have to pick one otherwise it'd be a nightmare). The
>
Thanks for the replies.
I thought the Live CD was a bad idea until I realised it can still be
booted under QEMU for non x86 users (Live CDs can be created for other
platforms - have to pick one otherwise it'd be a nightmare). The
tradeoff would be speed for x86 users vs ease of image maintenan
"John R. Hogerhuis"
>
> I can't say. But even if it were, I'd guess most here would rather work
> under Unix-like OS.
Undoubtably.
The Linux builders outnumber the Win builders by probably 50 to one. If not
more.
But I know from the effort I went through to get qemu to build under windows
th
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 14:13 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "John R. Hogerhuis"
>
> > BTW, one problem with WIndows is that QEMU developers do not have access
> > to Windows licenses. Might be nice for non-programmers who want to
> > contribute to donate old licensed copies of Windows for testin
"John R. Hogerhuis"
> BTW, one problem with WIndows is that QEMU developers do not have access
> to Windows licenses. Might be nice for non-programmers who want to
> contribute to donate old licensed copies of Windows for testing work.
Does the ReactOS build work well enough to do Mingw etc. deve
"Christian MICHON"
>untrue.
>http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/trial/default.mspx
>
>that would give 6 months to complete development...
I think they did one of them for a year.
However, I doubt they'd appreciate you distributing anything of theirs...
Can ReactOS be used to
> BTW, one problem with WIndows is that QEMU developers do not have access
> to Windows licenses. Might be nice for non-programmers who want to
> contribute to donate old licensed copies of Windows for testing work.
>
untrue.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/trial/default.msp
> For whatever reason I was thinking more along the lines of testing
> historical Windows OSes under QEMU, but good suggestion.
but keep in mind the following. You can install the eval 2003 sp1 on
only one machine. So make it a qemu one :)
Christian
_
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 20:24 +0200, Christian MICHON wrote:
> > BTW, one problem with WIndows is that QEMU developers do not have access
> > to Windows licenses. Might be nice for non-programmers who want to
> > contribute to donate old licensed copies of Windows for testing work.
> >
>
> untrue.
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 18:19 +0100, Tim Walker wrote:
> Is this a bad idea for some reason, or is it just unnecessary? Some
> feedback would be appreciated.
>
It's a cool idea, I think. I went through the mingw thing a while back
and it's a PITA. It would be nice to have known working build plat
you would probably need to setup cross compilers at least,
find a global linux config file generic enough (ex: no framebuffer),
and at least a initrd with minimum bins (static busybox would be
best).
This also implies you've a lot of time free :) if you want to do it for
many architectures/targets
Is this a bad idea for some reason, or is it just unnecessary? Some
feedback would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Tim
Tim Walker wrote:
How difficult would it be to create a (presumably Linux) uniform build
environment for all targets as a bootable Qemu image?
___
How difficult would it be to create a (presumably Linux) uniform build
environment for all targets as a bootable Qemu image?
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
14 matches
Mail list logo
