On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, malc wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
>
> > malc writes:
> >
> > All is the keyword here, i doubt that exhaustive search was performed
> > furthermore, AMDs documentation (to the best of my knowledge still)
> > still maintains that ZF is undefine
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> malc writes:
>
> All is the keyword here, i doubt that exhaustive search was performed
> furthermore, AMDs documentation (to the best of my knowledge still)
> still maintains that ZF is undefined.
>
> AMD indeed still says undefined in their
malc writes:
All is the keyword here, i doubt that exhaustive search was performed
furthermore, AMDs documentation (to the best of my knowledge still)
still maintains that ZF is undefined.
AMD indeed still says undefined in their documentation (as of two hours
ago). I have asked AMD for a
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> malc writes:
>
> And this one was March 2009 (conveniently having the same file name
> 253666), the September 2010 issue reads differently:
>
> Flags Affected
> The CF flag contains the value of the selected bit. The ZF flag is
> unaf
malc writes:
And this one was March 2009 (conveniently having the same file name
253666), the September 2010 issue reads differently:
Flags Affected
The CF flag contains the value of the selected bit. The ZF flag is
unaffected. The OF, SF, AF, and PF flags are undefined.
Have the q
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, malc wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Nathan Froyd wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:24:39PM +0100, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> > > malc writes:
> > >
> > > ZF is undefined according to AMD's 24594.pdf page 69.
> > >
> > > Ah, you're right. It seems that all existing
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:24:39PM +0100, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> > malc writes:
> >
> > ZF is undefined according to AMD's 24594.pdf page 69.
> >
> > Ah, you're right. It seems that all existing x86 implementations leave
> > ZF alone, though.
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:24:39PM +0100, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> malc writes:
>
> ZF is undefined according to AMD's 24594.pdf page 69.
>
> Ah, you're right. It seems that all existing x86 implementations leave
> ZF alone, though. (I am not arguing that qeum is broken, the bug is in
>
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> malc writes:
>
> ZF is undefined according to AMD's 24594.pdf page 69.
>
> Ah, you're right. It seems that all existing x86 implementations leave
> ZF alone, though. (I am not arguing that qeum is broken, the bug is in
> my code.)
>
> I apol
malc writes:
ZF is undefined according to AMD's 24594.pdf page 69.
Ah, you're right. It seems that all existing x86 implementations leave
ZF alone, though. (I am not arguing that qeum is broken, the bug is in
my code.)
I apologize for the false alarm!
--
Torbjörn
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> [This is a bug report, reported here since I was redirected to some
> corporate site when attempting to follow the recommended bug report
> practice. If I am really required to register an account with a
> corporation in order to report a qemu bug, a
[This is a bug report, reported here since I was redirected to some
corporate site when attempting to follow the recommended bug report
practice. If I am really required to register an account with a
corporation in order to report a qemu bug, and that bug reports are not
accepted here, then please
12 matches
Mail list logo
