On Wednesday 27 September 2006 4:27 am, Martin Guy wrote:
> There are some statistics at freaknet.org/martin/QEMU for various
> types of x86 processor, but giving only BogoMIPS, which are way
> overrated.
> I presume this is cos QEMU translates the kernel speed test loop once
> then runs it as x86
There are some statistics at freaknet.org/martin/QEMU for various
are in cluster.aleph1.co.uk/~martin/qemu.html (please ignore the other
Sorry, that first page is bogus. I meant the second.
M
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http
> If I run qemu for i386 without kqemu it uses soft-mmu, so it operates as
> another architetture as ppc or mips right?
> So... are the performace of qemu the same if I use i386 or mips or something
> change deeply?
> Example: if I run the same program on i386 emulation without kqemu or on
> mips
Alessandro Corradi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> This is my question:
> If I run qemu for i386 without kqemu it uses soft-mmu, so it operates as
> another architetture as ppc or mips right?
> So... are the performace of qemu the same if I use i386 or mips or something
> change deepl
Hi all,This is my question:If I run qemu for i386 without kqemu it uses soft-mmu, so it operates as another architetture as ppc or mips right?So... are the performace of qemu the same if I use i386 or mips or something change deeply?
Example: if I run the same program on i386 emulation without kqem
