On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 05:26:58PM +0400, Kirill Batuzov wrote:
> > diff --git a/tcg/tcg.c b/tcg/tcg.c
> > index c3a7f19..1133438 100644
> > --- a/tcg/tcg.c
> > +++ b/tcg/tcg.c
> > @@ -1329,8 +1329,8 @@ static void tcg_liveness_analysis(TCGContext *s)
> > the low part. The result c
> diff --git a/tcg/tcg.c b/tcg/tcg.c
> index c3a7f19..1133438 100644
> --- a/tcg/tcg.c
> +++ b/tcg/tcg.c
> @@ -1329,8 +1329,8 @@ static void tcg_liveness_analysis(TCGContext *s)
> the low part. The result can be optimized to a simple
> add or sub. This happens ofte
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:05:57PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 31.10.2012 00:56, schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
> >On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:24:34PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
> >>Am 30.10.2012 09:15, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> >>>Il 29/10/2012 19:29, Aurelien Jarno ha scritto:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012
Am 31.10.2012 00:56, schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:24:34PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 30.10.2012 09:15, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 29/10/2012 19:29, Aurelien Jarno ha scritto:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:53:14PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Known-good commit: 8473f37739321
Le 31/10/2012 15:08, Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
> Il 31/10/2012 15:05, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
Thanks! In general, do not rebase a branch unless you were able to test
the rebase fully. Use "git merge" instead. This does not apply to
people without commit access (unless they use pul
Il 31/10/2012 15:05, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>> > Thanks! In general, do not rebase a branch unless you were able to test
>> > the rebase fully. Use "git merge" instead. This does not apply to
>> > people without commit access (unless they use pull requests---perhaps we
>> > should use them mo
On 31 October 2012 15:01, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Thanks! In general, do not rebase a branch unless you were able to test
> the rebase fully. Use "git merge" instead. This does not apply to
> people without commit access (unless they use pull requests---perhaps we
> should use them more), but it
Il 31/10/2012 13:40, Aurelien Jarno ha scritto:
>>> I just tested with latest qemu-system-x86_64 on 32 bit Linux.
>>>
>>> It also hangs during boot (BIOS), so it looks like this
>>> is not a MinGW only problem.
>>>
>>> Your test with x86_64-linux-user indicates that, too.
>>>
>>> I also get the pro
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:56:36AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:24:34PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
> > Am 30.10.2012 09:15, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> > >Il 29/10/2012 19:29, Aurelien Jarno ha scritto:
> > >>On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:53:14PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:24:34PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 30.10.2012 09:15, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> >Il 29/10/2012 19:29, Aurelien Jarno ha scritto:
> >>On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:53:14PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Known-good commit: 8473f377393219390ea6f2d8d450a2b054bb823e
> Kn
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:24:34PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 30.10.2012 09:15, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> >Il 29/10/2012 19:29, Aurelien Jarno ha scritto:
> >>On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:53:14PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Known-good commit: 8473f377393219390ea6f2d8d450a2b054bb823e
> Kn
Am 30.10.2012 09:15, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 29/10/2012 19:29, Aurelien Jarno ha scritto:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:53:14PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Known-good commit: 8473f377393219390ea6f2d8d450a2b054bb823e
Known-bad commit: d262cb02861dd33375c08fc798930653b14769e9
i386-softmmu seems t
Il 29/10/2012 19:29, Aurelien Jarno ha scritto:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:53:14PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > Known-good commit: 8473f377393219390ea6f2d8d450a2b054bb823e
>> > Known-bad commit: d262cb02861dd33375c08fc798930653b14769e9
>> >
>> > i386-softmmu seems to work. I may try to bise
13 matches
Mail list logo