On 03/01/2017 10:58, Zhang Qian wrote:
>
> At 2017-01-03 17:38:49, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>>On 03/01/2017 09:12, Zhang Qian wrote:
>>> yes, you are right.
>>> The scenarios of problem is
>>> a scsi-disk object receives VERIFY command with BYTCHK bit being zero,
>>> scsi_block_is_passthrough
At 2017-01-03 17:38:49, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>On 03/01/2017 09:12, Zhang Qian wrote:
>> yes, you are right.
>> The scenarios of problem is
>> a scsi-disk object receives VERIFY command with BYTCHK bit being zero,
>> scsi_block_is_passthrough returns false and finally scsi-block uses
>> scsi_d
On 03/01/2017 09:12, Zhang Qian wrote:
> yes, you are right.
> The scenarios of problem is
> a scsi-disk object receives VERIFY command with BYTCHK bit being zero,
> scsi_block_is_passthrough returns false and finally scsi-block uses
> scsi_disk_dma_command for
> VERIFY. So the mode is set to SCS
At 2017-01-02 17:34:00, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>On 29/12/2016 13:19, Zhang Qian wrote:
>> From c2f1631132821d61e1942a8723ba596f91d3e672 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Zhang Qian
>> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 20:00:01 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] scsi-disk: fix crash on VERIFY command Commit 166dbda
On 29/12/2016 13:19, Zhang Qian wrote:
> From c2f1631132821d61e1942a8723ba596f91d3e672 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Zhang Qian
> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 20:00:01 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] scsi-disk: fix crash on VERIFY command Commit 166dbda
> "scsi-disk: fix VERIFY for scsi-block" add a proc
From c2f1631132821d61e1942a8723ba596f91d3e672 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhang Qian
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 20:00:01 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] scsi-disk: fix crash on VERIFY command Commit 166dbda
"scsi-disk: fix VERIFY for scsi-block" add a process of VERIFY in
scsi_block_dma_command. But, the
