Rob Landley writes:
> On 05/13/2011 07:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Rob Landley writes:
>>
>>> On 05/13/2011 01:54 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Rob Landley writes:
> On 05/12/2011 09:10 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Rob Landley writes:
>>
>>> In 1.14.0, if I
On 05/13/2011 07:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Rob Landley writes:
>
>> On 05/13/2011 01:54 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Rob Landley writes:
>>>
On 05/12/2011 09:10 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Rob Landley writes:
>
>> In 1.14.0, if I did this:
>>
>> qemu -n
Rob Landley writes:
> On 05/13/2011 01:54 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Rob Landley writes:
>>
>>> On 05/12/2011 09:10 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Rob Landley writes:
> In 1.14.0, if I did this:
>
> qemu -net nic,blah -net user -net nic,blah -net tun,blah
>
>
On 2011-05-13 12:31, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 05/13/2011 01:39 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Actually, reading qemu
>>> --help it looks like I should be using hostfwd= but the documentation on
>>> that is REALLY WEIRD:
>>>
>>> This option can not be given multiple times, but multiple rules may
>>>
On 05/13/2011 01:54 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Rob Landley writes:
>
>> On 05/12/2011 09:10 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Rob Landley writes:
>>>
In 1.14.0, if I did this:
qemu -net nic,blah -net user -net nic,blah -net tun,blah
Then the first nic would be -net
On 05/13/2011 01:39 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Actually, reading qemu
>> --help it looks like I should be using hostfwd= but the documentation on
>> that is REALLY WEIRD:
>>
>> This option can not be given multiple times, but multiple rules may
>> be combined.
>
> Where did you find this? A qui
Rob Landley writes:
> On 05/12/2011 09:10 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Rob Landley writes:
>>
>>> In 1.14.0, if I did this:
>>>
>>> qemu -net nic,blah -net user -net nic,blah -net tun,blah
>>>
>>> Then the first nic would be -net user, and the second nic would be -net
>>> tun.In curren
On 2011-05-13 03:49, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 08:19 PM, Vincent Palatin wrote:
First of all, as you have 2 totally separated subnets in your setup, I
think your command-line should use "vlan=" parameter to isolate them,
else you will end up with some random routing/broadcas
On Fri, 13 May 2011 03:19:42 AM Vincent Palatin wrote:
> > Does the kernel need some sort of vlan support compiled into it for this
> > to work, or can the kernel not care?
>
> You don't need anything in your kernel, this is for Qemu network layer
> configuration.
Just to explain a bit further: qe
On 05/12/2011 08:19 PM, Vincent Palatin wrote:
>>> First of all, as you have 2 totally separated subnets in your setup, I
>>> think your command-line should use "vlan=" parameter to isolate them,
>>> else you will end up with some random routing/broadcasting (and random
>>> tends to change over tim
On 05/12/2011 09:10 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Rob Landley writes:
>
>> In 1.14.0, if I did this:
>>
>> qemu -net nic,blah -net user -net nic,blah -net tun,blah
>>
>> Then the first nic would be -net user, and the second nic would be -net
>> tun.In current -git, -net user attaches to th
>> First of all, as you have 2 totally separated subnets in your setup, I
>> think your command-line should use "vlan=" parameter to isolate them,
>> else you will end up with some random routing/broadcasting (and random
>> tends to change over time).
>
> Does the kernel need some sort of vlan supp
On 05/12/2011 08:20 AM, Vincent Palatin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 22:39, Rob Landley wrote:
>> In 1.14.0, if I did this:
>>
>> qemu -net nic,blah -net user -net nic,blah -net tun,blah
>>
>> Then the first nic would be -net user, and the second nic would be -net
>> tun.In curre
Rob Landley writes:
> In 1.14.0, if I did this:
>
> qemu -net nic,blah -net user -net nic,blah -net tun,blah
>
> Then the first nic would be -net user, and the second nic would be -net
> tun.In current -git, -net user attaches to the second interface and
> -net tun attaches to the first, I.
Hi,
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 22:39, Rob Landley wrote:
> In 1.14.0, if I did this:
>
> qemu -net nic,blah -net user -net nic,blah -net tun,blah
>
> Then the first nic would be -net user, and the second nic would be -net
> tun. In current -git, -net user attaches to the second interface and
> -
In 1.14.0, if I did this:
qemu -net nic,blah -net user -net nic,blah -net tun,blah
Then the first nic would be -net user, and the second nic would be -net
tun.In current -git, -net user attaches to the second interface and
-net tun attaches to the first, I.E. the order is reversed.
Either
16 matches
Mail list logo
