On Fri, 25 Sep 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 16:30 +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> > Although we already have 'gfx_passthru' in b_info, this doesn't suffice
> > after we want to handle IGD specifically. Now we define a new field of
> > type, gfx_passthru_kind, to indicate we're tryi
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 16:30 +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> Although we already have 'gfx_passthru' in b_info, this doesn't suffice
> after we want to handle IGD specifically. Now we define a new field of
> type, gfx_passthru_kind, to indicate we're trying to pass IGD. Actually
> this means we can bene
Although we already have 'gfx_passthru' in b_info, this doesn't suffice
after we want to handle IGD specifically. Now we define a new field of
type, gfx_passthru_kind, to indicate we're trying to pass IGD. Actually
this means we can benefit this to support other specific devices just
by extending g
