Hi,
> > I believe this is same as 0x50 but on old Ironlake platform. Xen started
> > IGD passthrough support in Ironlake.
>
> Ok, unless anyone shouts really loudly and it doesn't affect anything
> newer than IronLake, I'm happy to let those fall off the plate. I don't
> have any older syste
om; m...@redhat.com;
> > stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
> > pbonz...@redhat.com; r...@twiddle.net; Ruan, Shuai
> >
> > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v10][PATCH 03/10] piix: create host bridge to
> > passthrough
> >
> > I can run that system as
com; r...@twiddle.net; Ruan, Shuai
>
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v10][PATCH 03/10] piix: create host bridge to
> passthrough
>
> I can run that system as either primary or secondary. On both systems I'm
> using pci-stub to keep i915 from interfering on the host, on the S
om; m...@redhat.com;
> > stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
> > pbonz...@redhat.com; r...@twiddle.net; Ruan, Shuai
> >
> > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v10][PATCH 03/10] piix: create host bridge to
> > passthrough
> >
> > Hi Allen,
> &
com; r...@twiddle.net; Ruan, Shuai
>
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v10][PATCH 03/10] piix: create host bridge to
> passthrough
>
> Hi Allen,
>
Hi Alex,
> Thanks for the reply. I'm totally onboard with you for BDW/SKL for
> supported platforms, but I'd like to u
ano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
> > pbonz...@redhat.com; r...@twiddle.net; Kay, Allen M
> >
> > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v10][PATCH 03/10] piix: create host bridge to
> > passthrough
> >
> >
> > Tiejun's email bounced, so adding All
.net; Kay, Allen M
>
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v10][PATCH 03/10] piix: create host bridge to
> passthrough
>
>
> Tiejun's email bounced, so adding Allen for comment.
>
Tiejun has left Intel. Shuai Ruan is his replacement (cc'ed).
> Host bridge registers
> 52
On 09/02/2016 18:43, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Tiejun's email bounced, so adding Allen for comment. Host bridge
> registers 52h, a4h, and a8h seem to be for versions of IGD prior to
> SandyBridge or just wrong. Even the GMCH (50h) doesn't seem to be
> necessary for the VM host bridge, so I'm thi
Tiejun's email bounced, so adding Allen for comment. Host bridge
registers 52h, a4h, and a8h seem to be for versions of IGD prior to
SandyBridge or just wrong. Even the GMCH (50h) doesn't seem to be
necessary for the VM host bridge, so I'm thinking about dropping all of
these for vfio-based IGD
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:37:43 +0800
Tiejun Chen wrote:
> Implement a pci host bridge specific to passthrough. Actually
> this just inherits the standard one. And we also just expose
> a minimal real host bridge pci configuration subset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirk
Implement a pci host bridge specific to passthrough. Actually
this just inherits the standard one. And we also just expose
a minimal real host bridge pci configuration subset.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
v10:
* Nothing is changed.
v9:
* Just rebase on the lat
11 matches
Mail list logo
