On 03/08/13 04:35, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:43:04AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:53:51PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
>>> That change is definitely just build related - I don't see how it
>>> could impact the final SeaBIOS binary. How did you
On 03/07/13 08:57, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:43:04AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:53:51PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
That change is definitely just build related - I don't see how it
could impact the final SeaBIOS binary. How did you conclude
Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Going out on a limb, I suspect qemu commit 5f876756 instead.
..
> I think the gcc version Anthony was using miscompiled SeaBIOS
Yeah, it is very common. Lots of distributions patch their
toolchains such that they don't compile firmware code correctly.
Firmware isn't a common
