On 10/20/18 5:31 PM, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> I like this. How does the appended look?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emilio
> ---8<---
>
> [PATCH] cpu: introduce cpu_has_work_with_iothread_lock
I might just inline cpu_has_work_bql into the one caller.
You could even share has_cpu_lock with the c
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 08:58:31 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 19/10/2018 03:06, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> > Soon we will call cpu_has_work without the BQL.
> >
> > Cc: David Gibson
> > Cc: Alexander Graf
> > Cc: qemu-...@nongnu.org
> > Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota
> > ---
> > target/ppc/tra
On 19/10/2018 03:06, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> Soon we will call cpu_has_work without the BQL.
>
> Cc: David Gibson
> Cc: Alexander Graf
> Cc: qemu-...@nongnu.org
> Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota
> ---
> target/ppc/translate_init.inc.c | 77 +++--
> 1 file changed, 73
Soon we will call cpu_has_work without the BQL.
Cc: David Gibson
Cc: Alexander Graf
Cc: qemu-...@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota
---
target/ppc/translate_init.inc.c | 77 +++--
1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/ppc/transl
