On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 03:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 11/10/2012 15:26, Avi Kivity ha scritto:
>>> A couple of fields were left uninitialized. This was not observed earlier
>>> because all address spaces were statically allocated. Also free alloc
A couple of fields were left uninitialized. This was not observed earlier
because all address spaces were statically allocated. Also free allocation
for those fields.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity
---
memory.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c
index 2f68d67
On 10/11/2012 03:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 11/10/2012 15:26, Avi Kivity ha scritto:
>> A couple of fields were left uninitialized. This was not observed earlier
>> because all address spaces were statically allocated. Also free allocation
>> for those fields.
>
> Patch is obvious, but the
Il 11/10/2012 15:26, Avi Kivity ha scritto:
> A couple of fields were left uninitialized. This was not observed earlier
> because all address spaces were statically allocated. Also free allocation
> for those fields.
Patch is obvious, but there are at least two alternatives: 1) using
memset 2) u