On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:08:16AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:24:33 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 02:05:22PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > > The suggested way to work around the virtio bug reported here
> > >
> > > http://lists.nongn
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:24:33 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 02:05:22PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > The suggested way to work around the virtio bug reported here
> >
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-08/msg00522.html
> >
> > is to introduce
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 02:05:22PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> The suggested way to work around the virtio bug reported here
>
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-08/msg00522.html
>
> is to introduce gaps between DIMMs. Igor's patchset changes the pc-dimm
> auto-address assig
The suggested way to work around the virtio bug reported here
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-08/msg00522.html
is to introduce gaps between DIMMs. Igor's patchset changes the pc-dimm
auto-address assignment to introduce gaps and ues the same from pc memhp.
This patchset does