Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC for-next 0/2] QOM VMStateDescription remix

2014-02-07 Thread Peter Maydell
On 7 February 2014 21:28, Andreas Färber wrote: > I have found a single such case: armv7m_nvic overrides arm_gic_common > with a completely different vmsd. How can we fix that? :) We can deduce from this that nobody's been using migration with the Cortex-M3, since it would obviously be totally bu

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC for-next 0/2] QOM VMStateDescription remix

2014-02-07 Thread Andreas Färber
Peter, Am 02.09.2013 13:41, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 04:03:56AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Based on a comment from mst, this mini-series proposes to change semantics of >> VMStateDescription registration to be more similar to those of static >> prope

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC for-next 0/2] QOM VMStateDescription remix

2013-09-02 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 04:03:56AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: > Hello, > > Based on a comment from mst, this mini-series proposes to change semantics of > VMStateDescription registration to be more similar to those of static > properties. > > Today, a device has one VMStateDescription, the las

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC for-next 0/2] QOM VMStateDescription remix

2013-09-02 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 29.07.2013 04:03, schrieb Andreas Färber: > Hello, > > Based on a comment from mst, this mini-series proposes to change semantics of > VMStateDescription registration to be more similar to those of static > properties. > > Today, a device has one VMStateDescription, the last assignment to dc-

[Qemu-devel] [RFC for-next 0/2] QOM VMStateDescription remix

2013-07-28 Thread Andreas Färber
Hello, Based on a comment from mst, this mini-series proposes to change semantics of VMStateDescription registration to be more similar to those of static properties. Today, a device has one VMStateDescription, the last assignment to dc->vmsd wins. This means that a device must take care to inc