On 29.03.2016 18:09, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 29.03.2016 um 17:56 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> On 29.03.2016 17:51, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 24.03.2016 um 20:07 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
As I responded to:
- http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg04464.html
- http
Am 29.03.2016 um 17:56 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 29.03.2016 17:51, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 24.03.2016 um 20:07 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> >> As I responded to:
> >> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg04464.html
> >> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-deve
On 29.03.2016 17:51, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 24.03.2016 um 20:07 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> As I responded to:
>> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg04464.html
>> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg05680.html
>>
>> I think a general solution for
Am 24.03.2016 um 20:07 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> As I responded to:
> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg04464.html
> - http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg05680.html
>
> I think a general solution for querying the block node tree would be
> nice
As I responded to:
- http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg04464.html
- http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg05680.html
I think a general solution for querying the block node tree would be
nice (I don't think we actually have one). The single patch in thi