> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> On 12/01/2018 07:13, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> >> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> >> On 11/01/2018 14:12, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> Bonzini
> >>
On 12/01/2018 07:13, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
>> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
>> On 11/01/2018 14:12, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
Bonzini
On 11/01/2018 09:27, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> +}
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> On 11/01/2018 14:12, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> >> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> >> Bonzini
> >> On 11/01/2018 09:27, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> >>> +} else {
> >>> +qemu_notify_event()
On 11/01/2018 14:12, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
>> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
>> Bonzini
>> On 11/01/2018 09:27, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
>>> +} else {
>>> +qemu_notify_event();
>>> +}
>>
>> Before this patch, what would do the qem
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> Bonzini
> On 11/01/2018 09:27, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> > +} else {
> > +qemu_notify_event();
> > +}
>
> Before this patch, what would do the qemu_notify_event?
We tried using qemu_notify_even
On 11/01/2018 09:27, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> +} else {
> +qemu_notify_event();
> +}
Before this patch, what would do the qemu_notify_event?
Thanks,
Paolo
> /* Does not need atomic_mb_set because a spurious wakeup is okay. */
This patch skips cpu_exec when there is no CPU code to execute in replay mode.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk
Signed-off-by: Maria Klimushenkova
---
cpus.c | 50 +--
include/sysemu/replay.h |3 +++
replay/replay.c | 13
