Pavel Dovgalyuk writes:
> Alex,
>
> Do you have newer fixed version of these patches?
I was waiting to see if there where any other review comments for the
rest of the RFC series before re-spinning.
>
> Pavel Dovgalyuk
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alex Bennée [mailto:alex.ben...@
Alex,
Do you have newer fixed version of these patches?
Pavel Dovgalyuk
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Bennée [mailto:alex.ben...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 1:38 PM
> To: pbonz...@redhat.com; boost.li...@gmail.com; pavel.dovga...@ispras.ru
> Cc: c...@braap.org; qemu-dev
> From: Alex Bennée [mailto:alex.ben...@linaro.org]
> Pavel Dovgalyuk writes:
>
> > Guest Windows XP doesn't boot with these patches.
>
> I'm guessing there is hardware attached to that machine?
Only mouse, keyboard and hdd.
> Did the asserts catch double locking?
No, they didn't.
The emula
Pavel Dovgalyuk writes:
> Guest Windows XP doesn't boot with these patches.
I'm guessing there is hardware attached to that machine? Did the asserts
catch double locking? As I said there are still changes to be made to
the hardware emulation that saves async events with the device data.
But th
Guest Windows XP doesn't boot with these patches.
Pavel Dovgalyuk
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Bennée [mailto:alex.ben...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 1:38 PM
> To: pbonz...@redhat.com; boost.li...@gmail.com; pavel.dovga...@ispras.ru
> Cc: c...@braap.org; qemu-devel@nong
Hi,
This series failed automatic build test. Please find the testing commands and
their output below. If you have docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
Type: series
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] BQL and Replay Lock changes
Message-id: 20170505103822.20641-1-alex.ben
Hi,
This RFC does two principle things. It continues the push to reduce
the BQL lock contention to a minimum by dropping the BQL for most of
the run loop - eventually only holding it for timer processing and
sleeping. The second part is an attempt to fix the breakage caused to
record/replay by the
