On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Fedorov Sergey wrote:
>
> On 12/04/2013 03:13 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> On 4 December 2013 10:08, Fedorov Sergey wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/03/2013 12:48 PM, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
This patch set implements a basic support of CPU core TrustZone feature.
>>
On 12/04/2013 03:13 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 4 December 2013 10:08, Fedorov Sergey wrote:
On 12/03/2013 12:48 PM, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
This patch set implements a basic support of CPU core TrustZone feature.
We'd like this patch series finally to be merged into mainstream. What
should be
On 4 December 2013 10:08, Fedorov Sergey wrote:
> On 12/03/2013 12:48 PM, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>>
>> This patch set implements a basic support of CPU core TrustZone feature.
> We'd like this patch series finally to be merged into mainstream. What
> should be done to achieve this goal?
I'd like
Hi Sergey,
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Fedorov Sergey wrote:
> On 12/03/2013 12:48 PM, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>>
>> This patch set implements a basic support of CPU core TrustZone feature.
>> The
>> following major functionalities are implemented:
>>* CPU monitor mode
>>* Separate code
On 12/03/2013 12:48 PM, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
This patch set implements a basic support of CPU core TrustZone feature. The
following major functionalities are implemented:
* CPU monitor mode
* Separate code translation for each secure state
* CPACR & NSACR co-processor access control
This patch set implements a basic support of CPU core TrustZone feature. The
following major functionalities are implemented:
* CPU monitor mode
* Separate code translation for each secure state
* CPACR & NSACR co-processor access control
* Separate TLB for each secure state
* Co-processo
