Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/9] qemu capabilities reporting and config changes

2012-03-20 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 05:09:57PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 19/03/2012 16:09, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: [...] > > > > I would like to push this series into 1.1 > > I think it's too early. However, we can definitely apply 1/2/7/8/9 now. I like patch 3 a lot, too. It would open the door

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/9] qemu capabilities reporting and config changes

2012-03-20 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, >> I have a few patches here that convert almost every option that matters >> into QemuOpts so that -writeconfig records it: -m, -bios, -localtime, >> -S, -M, -smp, -numa, -nodefaults, -no-shutdown, -no-reboot. The only >> thing that is left basically is -display, where I chickened out. >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/9] qemu capabilities reporting and config changes

2012-03-19 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 03/19/2012 11:45 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 19/03/2012 17:41, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: On 03/19/2012 11:33 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 19/03/2012 17:31, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: It also plumbs the existing command line options through QemuOpts via a special 'system' section. This me

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/9] qemu capabilities reporting and config changes

2012-03-19 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 03/19/2012 11:33 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 19/03/2012 17:31, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: It also plumbs the existing command line options through QemuOpts via a special 'system' section. This means that any command line option can be specified via readconfig and that the combination of -no

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/9] qemu capabilities reporting and config changes

2012-03-19 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 03/19/2012 11:09 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 19/03/2012 16:09, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: Hi, I didn't start out intending to write this series, but I end up here trying to resolve an issue in the gtk UI. What issue? :) I rewrote the scaling support and did some usability testing with m

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/9] qemu capabilities reporting and config changes

2012-03-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 19/03/2012 17:53, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: >> >> Yeah,it depends on what you consider good. :) My direction was like >> "let's cover 90% of the usecases with a decent syntax"; yours is "let's >> cover 100% of the usecases even though the syntax may stink". >> >> (There's time to convert -dis

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/9] qemu capabilities reporting and config changes

2012-03-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 19/03/2012 17:41, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: > On 03/19/2012 11:33 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 19/03/2012 17:31, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: > It also plumbs the existing command line options through QemuOpts via > a special > 'system' section. This means that any command line o

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/9] qemu capabilities reporting and config changes

2012-03-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 19/03/2012 17:31, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: >>> It also plumbs the existing command line options through QemuOpts via >>> a special >>> 'system' section. This means that any command line option can be >>> specified via >>> readconfig and that the combination of -nodefconfig and -writeconfig >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/9] qemu capabilities reporting and config changes

2012-03-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 19/03/2012 16:09, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: > Hi, > > I didn't start out intending to write this series, but I end up here trying to > resolve an issue in the gtk UI. What issue? :) > This series does some dramatic refactoring to -readconfig essentially throwing > away the existing (trivial

[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/9] qemu capabilities reporting and config changes

2012-03-19 Thread Anthony Liguori
Hi, I didn't start out intending to write this series, but I end up here trying to resolve an issue in the gtk UI. This series does some dramatic refactoring to -readconfig essentially throwing away the existing (trivial) implementation and replacing it with glib's GKeyFile support. It also plum