On 22/01/2016 23:38, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 22.01.2016 15:01, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/01/2016 18:37, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> In short, this patch gets rid of blockdev_mark_auto_del and
>>> blockdev_auto_del.
>>>
>>> With these patches, it is possible to create a new -drive with the sa
On 22.01.2016 15:01, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 08/01/2016 18:37, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> In short, this patch gets rid of blockdev_mark_auto_del and
>> blockdev_auto_del.
>>
>> With these patches, it is possible to create a new -drive with the same
>> id as soon as the DEVICE_DELETED event is
On 08/01/2016 18:37, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> In short, this patch gets rid of blockdev_mark_auto_del and
> blockdev_auto_del.
>
> With these patches, it is possible to create a new -drive with the same
> id as soon as the DEVICE_DELETED event is delivered (which equals to
> unrealize).
>
> I'm s
In short, this patch gets rid of blockdev_mark_auto_del and
blockdev_auto_del.
With these patches, it is possible to create a new -drive with the same
id as soon as the DEVICE_DELETED event is delivered (which equals to
unrealize).
I'm sorry I'm not able to explain the history (and probably do no
