On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:23:03AM -0700, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 September 2014 09:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Could you pls tell me whether my patch works, in your testing?
> > My box which had such an old glib seems to be dead.
>
> Can you give me a Subject: line or a URL in patchwo
On 16 September 2014 09:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Could you pls tell me whether my patch works, in your testing?
> My box which had such an old glib seems to be dead.
Can you give me a Subject: line or a URL in patchwork,
please? (I can't conveniently search by message-id.)
thanks
-- PMM
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 16/09/2014 18:20, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> >> > - bumping the minimum required version from 2.12 to 2.16. I suggest
> >> > bumping to the currently required version for Windows, which is 2.20
> >> > (released March 2009).
> > T
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:45:03AM -0700, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 September 2014 09:33, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 16/09/2014 18:28, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> >>> > Though you would just drop support for "make check" on RHEL5. Even
> >>> > "make -k check" would roughly work.
> >> Can't we
On 16 September 2014 09:33, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 16/09/2014 18:28, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>>> > Though you would just drop support for "make check" on RHEL5. Even
>>> > "make -k check" would roughly work.
>> Can't we just put in the makefile and configure magic to skip
>> the test if the
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:28:03AM -0700, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 September 2014 09:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 16/09/2014 18:20, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> >>> > - bumping the minimum required version from 2.12 to 2.16. I suggest
> >>> > bumping to the currently required version for Wi
Il 16/09/2014 18:28, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>> > Though you would just drop support for "make check" on RHEL5. Even
>> > "make -k check" would roughly work.
> Can't we just put in the makefile and configure magic to skip
> the test if the glib version is too old for it?
Yes, that's what Michae
On 16 September 2014 09:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 16/09/2014 18:20, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>>> > - bumping the minimum required version from 2.12 to 2.16. I suggest
>>> > bumping to the currently required version for Windows, which is 2.20
>>> > (released March 2009).
>> The commit message
Il 16/09/2014 18:20, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>> > - bumping the minimum required version from 2.12 to 2.16. I suggest
>> > bumping to the currently required version for Windows, which is 2.20
>> > (released March 2009).
> The commit message for a52d28afb suggests that this bump would be
> droppi
On 16 September 2014 08:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Glib recently introduced a robust way to run tests in a subprocess,
> which is used in test-qdev-global-props. However, we would like
> to have the same tests run with older versions of glib, and the
> older fork-based mechanisms works well enoug
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:43:24PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Glib recently introduced a robust way to run tests in a subprocess,
> which is used in test-qdev-global-props. However, we would like
> to have the same tests run with older versions of glib, and the
> older fork-based mechanisms wor
Glib recently introduced a robust way to run tests in a subprocess,
which is used in test-qdev-global-props. However, we would like
to have the same tests run with older versions of glib, and the
older fork-based mechanisms works well enough.
This still requires:
- bumping the minimum required v
12 matches
Mail list logo
