On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 07:27:59 +0100
Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 3/18/19 2:52 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 09:33:42PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> There is no need to propose the 'dual' interrupt mode interrupt device
> >> on POWER7/8 machines and the XIVE mode will
On 3/18/19 2:52 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 09:33:42PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> There is no need to propose the 'dual' interrupt mode interrupt device
>> on POWER7/8 machines and the XIVE mode will not operate. Simply force
>> XICS in this case.
>>
>> This makes the c
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 09:33:42PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> There is no need to propose the 'dual' interrupt mode interrupt device
> on POWER7/8 machines and the XIVE mode will not operate. Simply force
> XICS in this case.
>
> This makes the check in spapr_machine_init() redundant on XIVE
There is no need to propose the 'dual' interrupt mode interrupt device
on POWER7/8 machines and the XIVE mode will not operate. Simply force
XICS in this case.
This makes the check in spapr_machine_init() redundant on XIVE-only
machines.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater
---
hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c |