On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 19:01:39 -0700, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 23/08/2015 17:23, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> > Otherwise after an exception we end up in a deadlock.
>
> Can you explain better the path that exits cpu_exec with the lock taken?
In fact I cannot :-) So please ignore this patch.
I wro
On 23/08/2015 17:23, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> Otherwise after an exception we end up in a deadlock.
Can you explain better the path that exits cpu_exec with the lock taken?
Also, let's remove the recursive locking by introducing "mmap_lock()
already taken" variants of target_mprotect and target_
Otherwise after an exception we end up in a deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota
---
bsd-user/mmap.c | 12
cpu-exec.c | 1 +
include/exec/exec-all.h | 2 ++
linux-user/mmap.c | 8
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bsd-user/mmap
