Emilio G. Cota writes:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 18:34:38 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Emilio G. Cota writes:
> (snip)
>> > +static void rcu_init_child(void)
>> > +{
>> > +qemu_mutex_init(&rcu_registry_lock);
>> > +}
>> > #endif
>> >
>> > void rcu_after_fork(void)
>> > @@ -346,7 +351,7
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 18:34:38 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Emilio G. Cota writes:
(snip)
> > +static void rcu_init_child(void)
> > +{
> > +qemu_mutex_init(&rcu_registry_lock);
> > +}
> > #endif
> >
> > void rcu_after_fork(void)
> > @@ -346,7 +351,7 @@ void rcu_after_fork(void)
> > stati
Emilio G. Cota writes:
> We were unlocking this lock after fork, which is wrong since
> only the thread that holds a mutex is allowed to unlock it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota
> ---
> util/rcu.c | 7 ++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/util/rcu.c b/u
We were unlocking this lock after fork, which is wrong since
only the thread that holds a mutex is allowed to unlock it.
Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota
---
util/rcu.c | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/util/rcu.c b/util/rcu.c
index 8ba304d..47c2bce 100644
--
