Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/17] ppc: Remove some stub POWER6 models

2016-11-07 Thread David Gibson
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:11:52PM +1100, David Gibson wrote: > The CPU model table includes stub (commented out) definitions for > CPU_POWERPC_POWER6_5 and CPU_POWERPC_POWER6A. These are not real cpu > models, but represent the POWER6 in some compatiblity modes. If we ever > do implement POWER6

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/17] ppc: Remove some stub POWER6 models

2016-10-31 Thread David Gibson
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:38:53AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 30.10.2016 12:11, David Gibson wrote: > > The CPU model table includes stub (commented out) definitions for > > CPU_POWERPC_POWER6_5 and CPU_POWERPC_POWER6A. These are not real cpu > > models, but represent the POWER6 in some compat

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/17] ppc: Remove some stub POWER6 models

2016-10-31 Thread Thomas Huth
On 30.10.2016 12:11, David Gibson wrote: > The CPU model table includes stub (commented out) definitions for > CPU_POWERPC_POWER6_5 and CPU_POWERPC_POWER6A. These are not real cpu > models, but represent the POWER6 in some compatiblity modes. If we ever > do implement POWER6 (unlikely), I think

[Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/17] ppc: Remove some stub POWER6 models

2016-10-30 Thread David Gibson
The CPU model table includes stub (commented out) definitions for CPU_POWERPC_POWER6_5 and CPU_POWERPC_POWER6A. These are not real cpu models, but represent the POWER6 in some compatiblity modes. If we ever do implement POWER6 (unlikely), we'll implement its compatibility modes in a different way