Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] linux-user (mostly syscall.c)

2007-11-03 Thread J. Mayer
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 01:51 +, Paul Brook wrote: > > If you take a close look, you'll find more variations between Linux ABIs > > for different CPUs than between all BSD implementations: common syscalls > > of all BSD flavors do the same thing (and have the same ABI whatever the > > CPU...). Y

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] linux-user (mostly syscall.c)

2007-11-03 Thread Paul Brook
> If you take a close look, you'll find more variations between Linux ABIs > for different CPUs than between all BSD implementations: common syscalls > of all BSD flavors do the same thing (and have the same ABI whatever the > CPU...). You'll also find very few variations between the syscalls > com

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] linux-user (mostly syscall.c)

2007-11-03 Thread J. Mayer
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 19:16 -0600, Thayne Harbaugh wrote: > On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 20:13 +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote: > > Thayne Harbaugh wrote: > > > On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 13:52 +0100, J. Mayer wrote: > > >> On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:21 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > >> [...] > > >> But it could

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] linux-user (mostly syscall.c)

2007-11-03 Thread Thayne Harbaugh
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 20:13 +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote: > Thayne Harbaugh wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 13:52 +0100, J. Mayer wrote: > >> On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:21 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > >> [...] > >> But it could be great to group the syscalls by > >> categories, or so. For example

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] linux-user (mostly syscall.c)

2007-11-03 Thread Fabrice Bellard
Thayne Harbaugh wrote: > On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 13:52 +0100, J. Mayer wrote: >> On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:21 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote: >> [...] >> But it could be great to group the syscalls by >> categories, or so. For example, putting all POSIX compliant syscalls in >> a single file and using a

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] linux-user (mostly syscall.c)

2007-11-03 Thread TJ
I'm glad you posted about your efforts since I've also been working on solving related x86_64 build warnings caused by 32-bit int to 64-bit pointer conversions. warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size There are a lot of these in syscall.c I have in my drafts folder an RFC I was

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] linux-user (mostly syscall.c)

2007-11-03 Thread Thayne Harbaugh
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 13:52 +0100, J. Mayer wrote: > On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:21 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > Thayne Harbaugh wrote: > > > There are several things that I'd like to see addressed in linux-user. > > > Some of these are to fix bugs, some are to make qemu linux-user more > > > like

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] linux-user (mostly syscall.c)

2007-11-03 Thread J. Mayer
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:21 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Thayne Harbaugh wrote: > > There are several things that I'd like to see addressed in linux-user. > > Some of these are to fix bugs, some are to make qemu linux-user more > > like the Linux kernel, some are to make the internal qemu interfa

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] linux-user (mostly syscall.c)

2007-11-02 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Thayne Harbaugh wrote: > There are several things that I'd like to see addressed in linux-user. > Some of these are to fix bugs, some are to make qemu linux-user more > like the Linux kernel, some are to make the internal qemu interfaces > more consistent. > > An internal coding practice that is b

[Qemu-devel] [RFC] linux-user (mostly syscall.c)

2007-11-02 Thread Thayne Harbaugh
There are several things that I'd like to see addressed in linux-user. Some of these are to fix bugs, some are to make qemu linux-user more like the Linux kernel, some are to make the internal qemu interfaces more consistent. An internal coding practice that is being addressed bit-by-bit is that o