Kevin Wolf writes:
> Am 28.06.2017 um 09:10 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>> > On 06/27/2017 11:31 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> >> If that's what we're going to do, I think I can figure out something
>> >> nice for block nodes. That shouldn't be too hard. The only question
Am 28.06.2017 um 09:10 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Eric Blake writes:
> > On 06/27/2017 11:31 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> If that's what we're going to do, I think I can figure out something
> >> nice for block nodes. That shouldn't be too hard. The only question
> >> would be whether we w
Eric Blake writes:
> On 06/27/2017 11:31 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I haven't really liked query-block for a long time, but now that
>> blockdev-add and -blockdev have settled, it might finally be the time to
>> actually do something about it. In fact, if used together with these
>> mode
On 06/27/2017 11:31 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't really liked query-block for a long time, but now that
> blockdev-add and -blockdev have settled, it might finally be the time to
> actually do something about it. In fact, if used together with these
> modern interfaces, our query comm
Hi,
I haven't really liked query-block for a long time, but now that
blockdev-add and -blockdev have settled, it might finally be the time to
actually do something about it. In fact, if used together with these
modern interfaces, our query commands are simply broken, so we have to
fix something.