On 08/14/2011 02:30 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:>> Maybe something more like:
2 months development
-rc0 goes out (master enters soft feature freeze)
Why an rc0 at this point? 0.15-rc0 was in a bad shape because it was
forked just after heavy development (ga etc).
It could be called -beta1 instead o
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 08/12/2011 03:46 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
> In general the idea is OK. Especially soft freeze could solve problems
> like those qemu-ga inclusion had.
>>>
On 08/12/2011 03:46 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
In general the idea is OK. Especially soft freeze could solve problems
like those qemu-ga inclusion had.
Two weeks for soft freeze would be close to OK but I think a month of
hard freeze is
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> In general the idea is OK. Especially soft freeze could solve problems
>>> like those qemu-ga inclusion had.
>>>
>>> Two weeks for soft freeze would be close to OK but I think a month of
>>> hard freeze is too long. With the previo
Hi,
In general the idea is OK. Especially soft freeze could solve problems
like those qemu-ga inclusion had.
Two weeks for soft freeze would be close to OK but I think a month of
hard freeze is too long. With the previous releases, the problems in
stable were ironed out within a week or two.
On 08/11/2011 12:30 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hi,
I've posted an initial proposal for the 1.0 release on the wiki[1].
The release would be targeted for December 1st. Unlike previous releases,
I'm proposing that instead of forking master int
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted an initial proposal for the 1.0 release on the wiki[1].
>
> The release would be targeted for December 1st. Unlike previous releases,
> I'm proposing that instead of forking master into a stable branch and
> releasing f
Hi,
I've posted an initial proposal for the 1.0 release on the wiki[1].
The release would be targeted for December 1st. Unlike previous
releases, I'm proposing that instead of forking master into a stable
branch and releasing from there, we stop taking features into master and
all work on st
