On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 24.06.2011 07:41, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 23.06.2011 15:35, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:15:58AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> Fro
Am 24.06.2011 07:41, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 23.06.2011 15:35, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:15:58AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
Recent mingw32 provide those defines.
... and all of those defines
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 23.06.2011 15:35, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:15:58AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Jan Kiszka
>>>
>>> Recent mingw32 provide those defines.
>
> ... and all of those defines are wrong, because QEMU doe
Am 23.06.2011 15:35, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:15:58AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
Recent mingw32 provide those defines.
... and all of those defines are wrong, because QEMU does not use
MS format specifiers. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/74276/
tr
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:15:58AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka
>
> Recent mingw32 provide those defines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
> ---
> qemu-common.h |3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
It's never too late to implement C99!
Thanks, applied to
