On 10/31/2016 07:25 PM, Jianjun Duan wrote:
>
>
> On 10/31/2016 11:01 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/31/2016 06:32 PM, Jianjun Duan wrote:
>> I think this got overly complicated. Here is a little patch on
>>> top of your stuff which gets rid of 15 lines and IMHO simplifies
>>
On 10/31/2016 11:01 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>
> On 10/31/2016 06:32 PM, Jianjun Duan wrote:
> I think this got overly complicated. Here is a little patch on
>> top of your stuff which gets rid of 15 lines and IMHO simplifies
>> things quite a bit. What do you think?
>
On 10/31/2016 06:32 PM, Jianjun Duan wrote:
I think this got overly complicated. Here is a little patch on
> top of your stuff which gets rid of 15 lines and IMHO simplifies
> things quite a bit. What do you think?
>
> It is based on/inspired by Dave's p
On 10/31/2016 10:21 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>
> On 10/31/2016 06:10 PM, Jianjun Duan wrote:
>>> I think this got overly complicated. Here is a little patch on
top of your stuff which gets rid of 15 lines and IMHO simplifies
things quite a bit. What do you think?
It is bas
On 10/31/2016 06:10 PM, Jianjun Duan wrote:
>> I think this got overly complicated. Here is a little patch on
>> > top of your stuff which gets rid of 15 lines and IMHO simplifies
>> > things quite a bit. What do you think?
>> >
>> > It is based on/inspired by Dave's proposal with the dummy st
On 10/31/2016 06:10 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>
> On 10/28/2016 09:46 PM, Jianjun Duan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/28/2016 12:06 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>>> * Jianjun Duan (du...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
Currently we cannot directly transfer a QTAILQ instance because of the
limit
