On 09.08.2012, at 23:45, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 04:36 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 09.08.2012, at 23:28, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/09/2012 04:19 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09.08.2012, at 23:11, Scott Wood wrote:
> ...so that we can run new kernels on old Q
On 08/09/2012 04:36 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 09.08.2012, at 23:28, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>> On 08/09/2012 04:19 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09.08.2012, at 23:11, Scott Wood wrote:
...so that we can run new kernels on old QEMUs, not just the other way
around.
>>>
>>> Why w
On 09.08.2012, at 23:28, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 04:19 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 09.08.2012, at 23:11, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/09/2012 04:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09.08.2012, at 22:58, Scott Wood wrote:
> Additionally, we should consider adding ex
On 08/09/2012 04:19 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 09.08.2012, at 23:11, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>> On 08/09/2012 04:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09.08.2012, at 22:58, Scott Wood wrote:
Additionally, we should consider adding extra compatibles with the major
QEMU version in the
On 09.08.2012, at 23:11, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 04:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 09.08.2012, at 22:58, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/09/2012 03:52 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09.08.2012, at 22:50, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 03:48 PM, Alexander Gr
On 08/09/2012 04:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 09.08.2012, at 22:58, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>> On 08/09/2012 03:52 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09.08.2012, at 22:50, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>
On 08/09/2012 03:48 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 09.08.2012, at 00:40, Scott Wood
On 09.08.2012, at 22:58, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 03:52 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 09.08.2012, at 22:50, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/09/2012 03:48 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09.08.2012, at 00:40, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/08/2012 04:16 PM, Alexander Gr
On 08/09/2012 03:52 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 09.08.2012, at 22:50, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>> On 08/09/2012 03:48 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09.08.2012, at 00:40, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>
On 08/08/2012 04:16 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 24.06.2012, at 01:07, Alexander
On 09.08.2012, at 22:50, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 03:48 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 09.08.2012, at 00:40, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/08/2012 04:16 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.06.2012, at 01:07, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Due to popular demand, we're upd
On 08/09/2012 03:48 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 09.08.2012, at 00:40, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>> On 08/08/2012 04:16 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24.06.2012, at 01:07, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
Due to popular demand, we're updating the way we generate the MPIC
node and interrup
On 09.08.2012, at 00:40, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/08/2012 04:16 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 24.06.2012, at 01:07, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>> Due to popular demand, we're updating the way we generate the MPIC
>>> node and interrupt lines based on what the current state of art is.
>>>
On 08/08/2012 04:16 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 24.06.2012, at 01:07, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>> Due to popular demand, we're updating the way we generate the MPIC
>> node and interrupt lines based on what the current state of art is.
>>
>> Requested-by: Scott Wood
>> Signed-off-by: Alexand
On 24.06.2012, at 01:07, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Due to popular demand, we're updating the way we generate the MPIC
> node and interrupt lines based on what the current state of art is.
>
> Requested-by: Scott Wood
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
Hey Scott,
This patch breaks SMP for me. The
13 matches
Mail list logo