On 16 July 2014 10:17, Alex Bennée wrote:
> On aarch64 we do:
>
> #define unsupported_encoding(s, insn)\
> do { \
> qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, \
>
Joakim Tjernlund writes:
> Alexander Graf wrote on 2014/07/12 02:39:21:
>>
>>
>> On 11.07.14 20:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> > On 11 July 2014 19:15, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
>> >> Peter Maydell wrote on 2014/07/11
> 19:14:25:
>> >>> On 11 July 2014 16:18, Joakim Tjernlund
>
>> >> wrote:
> Date: 2014/07/16 09:55
>> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 4/4] ppc: remove excessive
> logging
>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 04:06:09PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>> Alexander Graf wrote on 2014/07/12 12:41:05:
>>>>
>>&
Riku Voipio wrote on 2014/07/16 09:55:50:
> From: Riku Voipio
> To: Joakim Tjernlund ,
> Cc: Alexander Graf , Peter Maydell
, "qemu-...@nongnu.org" ,
QEMU Developers
> Date: 2014/07/16 09:55
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 4/4] ppc: remove excessive
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 04:06:09PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Alexander Graf wrote on 2014/07/12 12:41:05:
> >
> > On 12.07.14 12:40, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On 12 July 2014 10:39, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > >> On 12.07.14 10:58, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > >>> On 12 July 2014 01:39, Alexan
Alexander Graf wrote on 2014/07/12 12:41:05:
>
> On 12.07.14 12:40, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 12 July 2014 10:39, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> On 12.07.14 10:58, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>> On 12 July 2014 01:39, Alexander Graf wrote:
> What do the other platforms do on illegal instructions
On 12.07.14 12:40, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 12 July 2014 10:39, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 12.07.14 10:58, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 12 July 2014 01:39, Alexander Graf wrote:
What do the other platforms do on illegal instructions during user mode?
Any way we can get consistency across the board?
On 12 July 2014 10:39, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 12.07.14 10:58, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> On 12 July 2014 01:39, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> What do the other platforms do on illegal instructions during user mode?
>>> Any way we can get consistency across the board?
>>
>> Mostly it looks l
On 12.07.14 10:58, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 12 July 2014 01:39, Alexander Graf wrote:
What do the other platforms do on illegal instructions during user mode?
Any way we can get consistency across the board?
Mostly it looks like they just silently generate the SIGILL.
Consistency has never bee
On 12 July 2014 01:39, Alexander Graf wrote:
> What do the other platforms do on illegal instructions during user mode?
> Any way we can get consistency across the board?
Mostly it looks like they just silently generate the SIGILL.
Consistency has never been our strong point :-)
thanks
-- PMM
Alexander Graf wrote on 2014/07/12 02:39:21:
>
>
> On 11.07.14 20:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 11 July 2014 19:15, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
> >> Peter Maydell wrote on 2014/07/11
19:14:25:
> >>> On 11 July 2014 16:18, Joakim Tjernlund
> >> wrote:
> ppc logs every type of Invalid ins
On 11.07.14 20:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 11 July 2014 19:15, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Peter Maydell wrote on 2014/07/11 19:14:25:
On 11 July 2014 16:18, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
ppc logs every type of Invalid instruction. This generates a lot
Rather than just deleting this EXCP_DUMP, I w
12 matches
Mail list logo
