On 10/26/2015 03:24 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Wen Congyang writes:
>
>> On 10/21/2015 04:27 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> [...]
>>> Can we phrase the operation differently? Instead of "insert between A
>>> and B (silently replacing everything that is now between A and B)",
>>> say one of
>
Wen Congyang writes:
> On 10/21/2015 04:27 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
[...]
>> Can we phrase the operation differently? Instead of "insert between A
>> and B (silently replacing everything that is now between A and B)",
>> say one of
>>
>> 1a. Replace node A by A <- blkdebug
>>
>> 1b. Replac
On 10/21/2015 04:27 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Sorry for my slow reply.
>
> Kevin Wolf writes:
>
>> Am 08.10.2015 um 13:02 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben:
>>> Am 08.10.2015 um 08:15 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
Max Reitz writes:
> E.g. you may have a block filter in the future wh
Sorry for my slow reply.
Kevin Wolf writes:
> Am 08.10.2015 um 13:02 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben:
>> Am 08.10.2015 um 08:15 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
>> > Max Reitz writes:
>> > > E.g. you may have a block filter in the future where you want to
>> > > exchange its child BDS. This exchan
Am 08.10.2015 um 13:02 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben:
> Am 08.10.2015 um 08:15 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> > Max Reitz writes:
> > > E.g. you may have a block filter in the future where you want to
> > > exchange its child BDS. This exchange should be an atomic operation, so
> > > we cannot
