Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/56] QOM devices patch queue 2013-10-31

2013-11-03 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 03.11.2013 19:58, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 3 November 2013 18:52, Andreas Färber wrote: >> I believe that info is already outdated as per IRC. A patch to ossaudio >> has been submitted to change the default away from OSS for virgin >> ./configure. Problem is lack of /dev/dsp on some distros

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/56] QOM devices patch queue 2013-10-31

2013-11-03 Thread Peter Maydell
On 3 November 2013 18:52, Andreas Färber wrote: > I believe that info is already outdated as per IRC. A patch to ossaudio > has been submitted to change the default away from OSS for virgin > ./configure. Problem is lack of /dev/dsp on some distros and > ossaudio.c's error handling for that case.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/56] QOM devices patch queue 2013-10-31

2013-11-03 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 03.11.2013 19:47, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 3 November 2013 16:32, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> In particular, the problem is that the lm4549 is bit-rotted which is >> spawned by pl041 which is pulled in by certain boards like the >> vexpress-a15 on arm-softmmu. My guess is that your config doe

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/56] QOM devices patch queue 2013-10-31

2013-11-03 Thread Peter Maydell
On 3 November 2013 16:32, Anthony Liguori wrote: > In particular, the problem is that the lm4549 is bit-rotted which is > spawned by pl041 which is pulled in by certain boards like the > vexpress-a15 on arm-softmmu. My guess is that your config doesn't > have audio enabled so this device is being

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/56] QOM devices patch queue 2013-10-31

2013-11-03 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Anthony, > > Am 03.11.2013 14:58, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Anthony, >>> The errors are the exact same as before. Install some VMs and reproduce the problem. I just chec

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/56] QOM devices patch queue 2013-10-31

2013-11-03 Thread Andreas Färber
Anthony, Am 03.11.2013 14:58, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Anthony, >> >>> The errors are the exact same as before. Install some VMs and >>> reproduce the problem. I just checked and it fails under 64-bit >>> Fedora 19. >> >> I have success

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/56] QOM devices patch queue 2013-10-31

2013-11-03 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Anthony, > >> The errors are the exact same as before. Install some VMs and >> reproduce the problem. I just checked and it fails under 64-bit >> Fedora 19. > > I have successfully booted up openSUSE 12.3 x86_64 and SLES 11 SP3 > x86_64 wit

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/56] QOM devices patch queue 2013-10-31

2013-11-03 Thread Andreas Färber
Anthony, Am 31.10.2013 22:03, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Hello Anthony, >> >> This is my updated QOM devices patch queue. Please pull or provide more >> details >> of what is not working in your build environment. > > Andreas, > > If yo

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/56] QOM devices patch queue 2013-10-31

2013-10-31 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Hello Anthony, > > This is my updated QOM devices patch queue. Please pull or provide more > details > of what is not working in your build environment. Andreas, If you cannot be bothered to adequately test your pull requests, then don't

[Qemu-devel] [PULL v2 00/56] QOM devices patch queue 2013-10-31

2013-10-31 Thread Andreas Färber
Hello Anthony, This is my updated QOM devices patch queue. Please pull or provide more details of what is not working in your build environment. v2 is rebased, dropping two ARM patches, and the observed SD segfault had been fixed in 794cbc26eb94ce13c75d105eea9ff0afff56e2c2. Patches are not manual