On 2015-08-19 08:49, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 08/18/2015 04:23 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > Hi. I'm afraid this fails 'make check' on 32-bit ARM for me:
>
> Found it. The problem is in the temps tracking patch, where we weren't
> ignoring TCG_CALL_DUMMY_ARG (-1). This isn't used on x86 of c
On 08/18/2015 04:23 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Hi. I'm afraid this fails 'make check' on 32-bit ARM for me:
Found it. The problem is in the temps tracking patch, where we weren't
ignoring TCG_CALL_DUMMY_ARG (-1). This isn't used on x86 of course, which is
why we didn't see this failure there.
T
On 08/18/2015 04:23 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
Hi. I'm afraid this fails 'make check' on 32-bit ARM for me:
...
(i386-softmmu doesn't segv, so probably it's a 64-bit-ops-on-32-bit
thing.)
Sadly, this doesn't fail on 32-bit x86 host. I've started a build on an arm
host, but it may be a while b
On 18 August 2015 at 15:59, Richard Henderson wrote:
> This pull includes three independent patch sets, which were
> all posted during the 2.4 freeze.
>
> The first is algorithmic improvements to tcg/optimize, both
> improving its runtime and its tracking of constants.
>
> The second is improvemen
This pull includes three independent patch sets, which were
all posted during the 2.4 freeze.
The first is algorithmic improvements to tcg/optimize, both
improving its runtime and its tracking of constants.
The second is improvements to the representation of 32<->64-bit
size changing operations.
