On 24.07.2014 14:30, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Stephan,
>
> Am 24.07.2014 10:28, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
>> From: Stephan Kulow
>>
>> If the client asks for !incremental frame updates, it has lost its content
>> so dirty doesn't matter - it has to see the full frame, so setting
>> force_update
>>
>
Am 24.07.2014 15:45, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
> On 24.07.2014 14:30, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 24.07.2014 10:28, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
>>> From: Stephan Kulow
>>>
>>> If the client asks for !incremental frame updates, it has lost its content
>>> so dirty doesn't matter - it has to see the full fr
Stephan,
Am 24.07.2014 10:28, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
> From: Stephan Kulow
>
> If the client asks for !incremental frame updates, it has lost its content
> so dirty doesn't matter - it has to see the full frame, so setting
> force_update
>
Can you please sign off your (trivial) patch via repl
From: Stephan Kulow
If the client asks for !incremental frame updates, it has lost its content
so dirty doesn't matter - it has to see the full frame, so setting force_update
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
Reviewed-by: Peter Lieven
---
ui/vnc.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git