On 09/24/2015 07:19 PM, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:19:19 +0300, shmulik.ladk...@ravellosystems.com wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 17:14:52 +0100, stefa...@redhat.com wrote:
>>> From: Fam Zheng
>>>
>>> Commit 6e99c63 ("net/socket: Drop net_socket_can_send") changed the
Hi,
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:19:19 +0300, shmulik.ladk...@ravellosystems.com wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 17:14:52 +0100, stefa...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Fam Zheng
> >
> > Commit 6e99c63 ("net/socket: Drop net_socket_can_send") changed the
> > semantics around .can_receive for sockets to now r
Hi,
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 17:14:52 +0100, stefa...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Fam Zheng
>
> Commit 6e99c63 ("net/socket: Drop net_socket_can_send") changed the
> semantics around .can_receive for sockets to now require the device to
> flush queued pkts when transitioning to a .can_receive=true stat
From: Fam Zheng
Commit 6e99c63 ("net/socket: Drop net_socket_can_send") changed the
semantics around .can_receive for sockets to now require the device to
flush queued pkts when transitioning to a .can_receive=true state. But
it's OK to drop incoming packets when the link is not active.
Signed-o
