On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:41:41PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Peter Xu
>
> The IOTLB that it returned didn't guarantee that page_mask is indeed a
> so-called page mask. That won't affect current usage since now only
> vhost is using it (vhost API allows arbitary IOTLB range). However we
From: Peter Xu
The IOTLB that it returned didn't guarantee that page_mask is indeed a
so-called page mask. That won't affect current usage since now only
vhost is using it (vhost API allows arbitary IOTLB range). However we
have IOTLB scemantic and we should best follow it. This patch fixes this
