On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 16:48 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > I wonder if prom_init should "touch" the entire kernel for safety,
> > but in any case, OpenBIOS need that fix urgently.
>
> Ah, ok, I hadn't realized that OpenBIOS still failed to boot, just
> later in the process with this hunk left out.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 02:42:08PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 15:48 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> >
> > This reworks emulation of the various "rfi" variants. I removed
> > some masking bits that I couldn't make sense of, the only b
On 27/06/16 05:42, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 15:48 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>>
>> This reworks emulation of the various "rfi" variants. I removed
>> some masking bits that I couldn't make sense of, the only bit that
>> I am aware we sh
On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 15:48 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>
> This reworks emulation of the various "rfi" variants. I removed
> some masking bits that I couldn't make sense of, the only bit that
> I am aware we should mask here is POW, the CPU's MSR mask should
> take
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
This reworks emulation of the various "rfi" variants. I removed
some masking bits that I couldn't make sense of, the only bit that
I am aware we should mask here is POW, the CPU's MSR mask should
take care of the rest.
This also fixes some problems when running 32-bi
