Il 19/01/2013 11:21, Blue Swirl ha scritto:
>> > Does the function really needs to be called qemu_vmalloc? If not,
>> > having the same name for two different things is bad.
> I've just sent a patch to fix this.
>
> But new code could be introduced that used qemu_vmalloc() so I'm not
> sure this
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 18/01/2013 19:03, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>> I believe this broke bsd-user: util/oslib-posix.c has qemu_vmalloc()
>> guarded with
>> #if !defined(CONFIG_BSD_USER)
>> which now no longer shields it from the qemu_vmalloc() reimplementati
Il 18/01/2013 19:03, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> I believe this broke bsd-user: util/oslib-posix.c has qemu_vmalloc()
> guarded with
> #if !defined(CONFIG_BSD_USER)
> which now no longer shields it from the qemu_vmalloc() reimplementation
> in bsd-user/mmap.c.
>
> Any suggestion how to fix?
Does
Am 12.01.2013 18:35, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Alon Levy (1):
> libcacard: fix missing symbol in libcacard.so
>
> Paolo Bonzini (26):
> qemu-option: move standard option definitions out of qemu-config.c
> stubs: fully replace qemu-tool.c and qemu-user.c
> build: make libtool
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:35:11PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The following changes since commit 63fb2590839162afdf14d7c0ee02d460766c0956:
>
> Merge branch 'target-arm.next' of
> git://git.linaro.org/people/pmaydell/qemu-arm (2013-01-12 12:47:07 +)
>
> are available in the git repositor
The following changes since commit 63fb2590839162afdf14d7c0ee02d460766c0956:
Merge branch 'target-arm.next' of
git://git.linaro.org/people/pmaydell/qemu-arm (2013-01-12 12:47:07 +)
are available in the git repository at:
git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git stub
for you to fetch changes u
