On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:39PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Ping^3. Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
>
> r~
>
> On 06/02/2011 07:56 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > Ping^2.
> >
> > r~
> >
> > On 05/27/2011 12:55 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >> Ping?
> >>
> >>
> >> r~
> >>
> >> On 05/23/2
Ping^3. Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
r~
On 06/02/2011 07:56 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Ping^2.
>
> r~
>
> On 05/27/2011 12:55 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> Ping?
>>
>>
>> r~
>>
>> On 05/23/2011 01:28 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> Changes from v4 -> v5
>>>
>>> * Claim official ownersh
Ping^2.
r~
On 05/27/2011 12:55 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Ping?
>
>
> r~
>
> On 05/23/2011 01:28 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> Changes from v4 -> v5
>>
>> * Claim official ownership of the Alpha port, rather
>> than leave it as "unmaintained".
>>
>> * Drop all the patches in hw/
Ping?
r~
On 05/23/2011 01:28 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Changes from v4 -> v5
>
> * Claim official ownership of the Alpha port, rather
> than leave it as "unmaintained".
>
> * Drop all the patches in hw/ for now. While they're necessary
> to actually make the port work, these
Changes from v4 -> v5
* Claim official ownership of the Alpha port, rather
than leave it as "unmaintained".
* Drop all the patches in hw/ for now. While they're necessary
to actually make the port work, these are the subset of the whole
patchset for which I'm confident I'm doing
