Am 04.02.2011 13:30, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Hello,
these are some patches which I found on my stack of open patches.
All of them should go into 0.14, and at least some of them could also
be applied to 0.13.
This need the following Acks:
[PATCH] h
Stefan Weil writes:
> Am 04.02.2011 16:27, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
>> Anthony Liguori writes:
>>
>>
>>> On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>>
>> [...]
>>
[PATCH 1/3] tests: Fix two memory leaks
(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79945/)
>>
>>>
Am 04.02.2011 16:27, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Anthony Liguori writes:
On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
[...]
[PATCH 1/3] tests: Fix two memory leaks
(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79945/)
[PATCH 2/3] check-qdict: Fix possible crash
(http://patchwork
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:36:39 +0100
Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 04.02.2011 18:21, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> > On 02/04/2011 11:18 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> >> Am 04.02.2011 16:27, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
> >>> Anthony Liguori writes:
> >>>
> On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> >>> [.
Am 07.02.2011 19:54, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
This wasn't denied, what Markus said is that this is test code and
thus it isn't high priority for the (now released) 0.14 release.
That's ok. Fixing the code in master is fine.
Thanks,
Stefan
On 02/04/2011 02:30 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This need the following Acks:
[PATCH] linux-user: Fix possible realloc memory leak
(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79217/)
Riku
I thought I gave an OK for this already.
Acked-By: Riku Voipio
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 06:30:24AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >[PATCH 1/3] pci: Fix memory leak
> >(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79996/)
>
> mst (looks like he did)
Yes, ack.
On 02/04/2011 11:36 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Hi Anthony,
please accept that even if you said something multiple times,
other people might have a different point of view.
Yup, just making my point of view clear.
QEMU is team work, isn't it?
Both positives are correct, there was no false positi
Am 04.02.2011 18:21, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 02/04/2011 11:18 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 04.02.2011 16:27, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Anthony Liguori writes:
On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
[...]
[PATCH 1/3] tests: Fix two memory leaks
(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79945
On 02/04/2011 11:18 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 04.02.2011 16:27, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Anthony Liguori writes:
On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
[...]
[PATCH 1/3] tests: Fix two memory leaks
(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79945/)
[PATCH 2/3] check-qdict: Fix possible cra
Am 04.02.2011 16:27, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Anthony Liguori writes:
On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
[...]
[PATCH 1/3] tests: Fix two memory leaks
(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79945/)
[PATCH 2/3] check-qdict: Fix possible crash
(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79946/
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:27:46 +0100
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Anthony Liguori writes:
>
> > On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> [...]
> >> [PATCH 1/3] tests: Fix two memory leaks
> >> (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79945/)
>
> >> [PATCH 2/3] check-qdict: Fix possible crash
> >> (h
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > these are some patches which I found on my stack of open patches.
> >
> > All of them should go into 0.14, and at least some of them could also be
> > applied to 0.13.
>
> This need the fo
On 02/04/2011 09:27 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Anthony Liguori writes:
On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
[...]
[PATCH 1/3] tests: Fix two memory leaks
(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79945/)
[PATCH 2/3] check-qdict: Fix possible crash
(http://patchwor
Anthony Liguori writes:
> On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
[...]
>> [PATCH 1/3] tests: Fix two memory leaks
>> (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79945/)
>> [PATCH 2/3] check-qdict: Fix possible crash
>> (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79946/)
>
> Luiz
I wouldn't bother with the se
On 04.02.2011, at 13:30, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> these are some patches which I found on my stack of open patches.
>>
>> All of them should go into 0.14, and at least some of them could also be
>> applied to 0.13.
>
> This need t
On 02/04/2011 01:30 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
[PATCH 3/3] w64: Fix problem with missing sigset_t
(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79947/)
We don't support w64...
AFAIK mingw-w64 supports both 32-bit and 64-bit compilation, so the
patch subject is misleading.
Paolo
On 02/02/2011 01:28 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Hello,
these are some patches which I found on my stack of open patches.
All of them should go into 0.14, and at least some of them could also
be applied to 0.13.
This need the following Acks:
[PATCH] hw/fmopl: Fix buffer access out-of-bounds err
Also:
From: Gleb Natapov
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] do not pass NULL to strdup.
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:34:34 +0200
Message-ID: <20110202153434.gp14...@redhat.com>
Hello,
these are some patches which I found on my stack of open patches.
All of them should go into 0.14, and at least some of them could also be
applied to 0.13.
[PATCH] hw/fmopl: Fix buffer access out-of-bounds errors
(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79054/)
[PATCH] linux-user: Fix possi
20 matches
Mail list logo
